sometimes happens that a movie that at first you seemed a little wordy, which maybe you do sleep you were a part, in the days after you dig in like a mole. To me it happens often and usually with movies that I like and remember to order more. And 'effect that made me "Lions for Lambs" by Robert Redford.
controcoglioni with film critics are keen to stress that it is a film sided, biased, ohibò of that inveterate Democrat of Redford. So he does not like because if it's nice and cool out the good side of the former Dirty Harry carognone ammorbiditosi with age, who are surprised that it was democratic in his youth does not become a fascistaccio old.
Redford may not have the courage to cry out fuck you in the face that the ruling class in this film which tells the crimes because he is a gentleman but uses subtle allusions, however, and a finish that is worse than a razor that takes you via the ear.
E 'a film in parallel. Two soldiers volunteers (metaphorically represented by the black and dall'ispanico) sent to the slaughterhouse, a young senator 'rrampante with my heart in crocodile who ends up believing that tells the bales, a journalist like you have never do more, with neurons that light to produce their own light and perlamadonna questions! to interview the senator for his television network, a Socratic teacher who seeks to awaken the brilliant but lazy schoolboy, the one in power capable of great things, "that could do more but it has for cock. There is one America to rebuild (even one left?) And you have to get busy with the material that you have available.
What is the basic thesis of the film? This war, this war, came after 11 September
, are built on lies. The great empire
U.S. military sends more soldiers to the fray as in Vietnam. "I think militarese for bait," notes Senator Streep Cruise when he pretends the gimmick of sending small groups of soldiers in the midst of the Taliban the top of a mountain as a major campaign of decisive war. Country desk study in Washington by people who could face up to the skin in the shower and slipping that specializes in sending others to die for his pigs interests. Those others who can still be heroes, lions of the title, in fact.
The dialectical duel between Streep and Cruise is the key piece of the puzzle, one that lays bare the role of politics and the press as complicit in the fate of the people to drag into the abyss of war. It 's only when the two act in synergy that the trick works wonders.
"When did you become so?" Cruise ironically asks his interlocutor, meaning "any Berva so good at dancing."
"We were were attacked, the boys were committed to the front, "is the justification that gives Streep and that anyone who would, under certain conditions and especially being an American. easy to think that if the lions were to know the extent to which they have lambs deceived would soon to tear mercilessly.
When Meryl comes back to the office and talk to his boss made the interview with the senator, his doubts and says "we can not automatically restore everything the government tells us," Redford shows us a 'America still desperately clinging to democratic values, but perhaps not resist the logic of selecting securities for breaking news.
I think this film is digging me in because, even though he speaks of America, the war in Afghanistan, the heroism of the Marines, the country and the media stars and stripes is a film about Italy and what has become to us the information.
What black hole is taken away, our press? Where are the journalists doing the questions and pocket the powerful interviewed, as did the late lamented dell'Oriana the old days? What would they say "no, that I can not write?
We might ask where are the journalists and that's it, replaced by a race of rulers of code and microphones, with his head that makes it like the dogs-spring of the 60 cars. Retriever puppies bales packaged.
Now imagine the same film set in Italy. A reporter enters the studio to interview the senator. He lies down a lion's skin, or kneeling at which point you can not imagine another, as follows, that a porn film.
Redford may not have the courage to cry out fuck you in the face that the ruling class in this film which tells the crimes because he is a gentleman but uses subtle allusions, however, and a finish that is worse than a razor that takes you via the ear.
E 'a film in parallel. Two soldiers volunteers (metaphorically represented by the black and dall'ispanico) sent to the slaughterhouse, a young senator 'rrampante with my heart in crocodile who ends up believing that tells the bales, a journalist like you have never do more, with neurons that light to produce their own light and perlamadonna questions! to interview the senator for his television network, a Socratic teacher who seeks to awaken the brilliant but lazy schoolboy, the one in power capable of great things, "that could do more but it has for cock. There is one America to rebuild (even one left?) And you have to get busy with the material that you have available.
What is the basic thesis of the film? This war, this war, came after 11 September
, are built on lies. The great empire U.S. military sends more soldiers to the fray as in Vietnam. "I think militarese for bait," notes Senator Streep Cruise when he pretends the gimmick of sending small groups of soldiers in the midst of the Taliban the top of a mountain as a major campaign of decisive war. Country desk study in Washington by people who could face up to the skin in the shower and slipping that specializes in sending others to die for his pigs interests. Those others who can still be heroes, lions of the title, in fact.
The dialectical duel between Streep and Cruise is the key piece of the puzzle, one that lays bare the role of politics and the press as complicit in the fate of the people to drag into the abyss of war. It 's only when the two act in synergy that the trick works wonders.
"When did you become so?" Cruise ironically asks his interlocutor, meaning "any Berva so good at dancing."
"We were were attacked, the boys were committed to the front, "is the justification that gives Streep and that anyone who would, under certain conditions and especially being an American. easy to think that if the lions were to know the extent to which they have lambs deceived would soon to tear mercilessly.
When Meryl comes back to the office and talk to his boss made the interview with the senator, his doubts and says "we can not automatically restore everything the government tells us," Redford shows us a 'America still desperately clinging to democratic values, but perhaps not resist the logic of selecting securities for breaking news.
I think this film is digging me in because, even though he speaks of America, the war in Afghanistan, the heroism of the Marines, the country and the media stars and stripes is a film about Italy and what has become to us the information.
What black hole is taken away, our press? Where are the journalists doing the questions and pocket the powerful interviewed, as did the late lamented dell'Oriana the old days? What would they say "no, that I can not write?
We might ask where are the journalists and that's it, replaced by a race of rulers of code and microphones, with his head that makes it like the dogs-spring of the 60 cars. Retriever puppies bales packaged.
Now imagine the same film set in Italy. A reporter enters the studio to interview the senator. He lies down a lion's skin, or kneeling at which point you can not imagine another, as follows, that a porn film.
0 comments:
Post a Comment